The e-cigarette has been pushed centre stage to coincide with World No Tobacco Day, with international doctors and policy experts urging the UN’s health agency to embrace the gadget as a life saver.
Tobacco smoke claims a life every six seconds, and the tar-free, electronic alternative could help prevent much of the cancer, heart and lung disease and strokes caused by the toxins in traditional cigarettes, the 50-odd experts wrote to World Health Organisation chief Margaret Chan.
E-cigarettes “could be among the most significant health innovations of the 21st century, perhaps saving hundreds of millions of lives”, the group said.
However, Australia’s Cancer Council and Heart Foundation see the devices as a threat to public health.
“We do not need a new reason for thousands of young Australians to be addicted to nicotine,” said Paul Grogan, director of advocacy at Cancer Council Australia.
Although it was not known how many Australians used the devices, he said they were likely to be less popular than in countries where they were heavily promoted.
The international group urged “courageous leadership” from the World Health Organisation (WHO) in guiding global and national approaches to e-cigarettes, which are banned in countries such as Brazil and Singapore, and face increasingly harsh restrictions in other countries amid uncertainty about their long-term health effects.
The group fears the WHO plans to lump the battery-powered devices, which release nicotine in a vapour instead of smoke and contain fewer toxins, with traditional cigarettes under its tobacco control policy.
This would compel member countries to ban advertising and use of the gadgets in public places, and to impose sin taxes.
“It would be unethical and harmful to inhibit the option to switch to tobacco harm-reduction products” like e-cigarettes, the letter said.
The WHO is working on recommendations for e-cigarette regulation, to be presented to a meeting of member governments in October.
An estimated seven million people in Europe alone use e-cigarettes, which were invented in China in 2003.
Addiction specialist Gerry Stimson, an emeritus professor at University College London who co-signed the letter to Chan, said they had been shown to release “very, very fractional levels” of toxins compared with conventional ones.
“People smoke for the nicotine and die of the tar,” said Stimson.
“If you separate the nicotine from the burning of vegetable matter … people can still use nicotine but they’re not going to die from smoking.”
The group of epidemiologists, oncologists, addiction experts and health policy specialists who signed the letter included Nigel Gray, a member of the WHO’s special advisory committee on tobacco regulation, Michel Kazatchkine, a member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy and a “harm reduction” advocate, and African Medical Association president Kgosi Letlape.
A recent study of nearly 6000 people who quit smoking in England between 2009 and 2014 found they were 60 times more likely to succeed using e-cigarettes than nicotine patches or gum, or going cold turkey.
However, a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association in March said e-cigarettes “did not significantly predict quitting one year later”.
In this grey zone, US regulators have proposed the first restrictions on its soaring $US2 billion ($A2.16 billion) e-cigarette market, with a minimum age limit and health warning labels.
EU MPs have agreed to allow countries to restrict e-cigarette sales to pharmacies.
The WHO says tobacco kills nearly six million people a year, and climbing.
On its website, however, it says the world’s estimated 1.3 billion smokers should be “strongly advised” not to turn to e-cigarettes until proven safe.
The nicotine in e-cigarettes is typically contained in a propylene glycol liquid that is heated to create a vapour inhaled like smoke.
Some e-liquids are free of nicotine, an addictive stimulant that can be toxic in large amounts.
“We know all these products perfectly and there is no health concern,” said Jacques Le Houezec, a French consultant in tobacco dependence who co-signed the letter.
“We have observed no long-term effects.”
The WHO would not comment on the contents of the letter.
On World No Tobacco Day (May 31) the letter urged countries to raise tobacco taxes, saying a 50-per cent increase would reduce the number of smokers by 49 million within next three years and save 11 million lives.
What do you think of e-cigarettes? Comment below or share your thoughts on our Facebook!
QUIT OR DIE, no other solutions allowed
35 plus years of smoking. Tried many times to quit using the recommended methods with no success. But am now 3 months happily a vaper. Despite their discouragement.
There is no argument against e-cigarettes being a harm reduction option, especially for long time smokers such as myself and all the other people who have given up tobacco smoking using e-cigarettes when all other cessation methods have failed. The Cancer Council and Heart foundation just can’t give up the idea that smokers will quit if beaten up enough by using cold turkey or useless, and/or harmful, pharmaceuticals. They use the “we don’t know the long term effects” or the “what about the children” arguments when there is a lot of research to prove them wrong. Weird!
This is my score card on stopping smoking after 32 years of doing it…
NRT Gum = Fail,
NRT Patch = Fail,
Cold Turkey = Fail,
Zyban = Fail,
Allen Carr method = Fail (8 days abstinence but ended up failing),
Champix = Fail,
NRT Spray = Fail,
Quit Line Support = Fail.
E-CIGARETTES = SUCCESS – 8 months and not a puff of tobacco and guess what, I’m happy.
Agree there is a quit or die mentality, evidence in favor of harm reduction is being ignored in favor of brain chemical altering pills, puffers with hydrochloric acid in them (nicorette quickmist) gums that cause perm damage and more….and who is funding the cancer councils and other pushes against ecig.. follow the money and you find big pharma. If over legislation of ecigs occur.. you will find both big pharma and big tobaco have alot to gain.. the waters are already being tested by them
I smoked cigarettes for 50 years and was never able to quit. I tried several times using patches, gum, zyban etc.
I purchased a 2nd generation e-cig 10 months ago and had my last cigarette the day after. Quiting was so easy. I actually enjoyed vaping more than smoking. I haven’t had a cigarette in the last 10 months and will never go back to smoking. My health has improved in so many ways. I feel so much better and I’m able to exercise every day. I was involved in a very large world wide survey of people using a personal vaporizer and the quit rate was 81%. These things work!
Why do they want to ban them when dozens of scientific studies have proven their effectiveness and saftey.
While e-cigs are a God send for smokers around the world. They may be a major financial problem for big pharmaceutical companies and governments. In other words profits are more important than health. I used to spend $80.00 a week on cigarettes a big percentage of that went to the gov in tax. Multiply that by millions. There’s over 2 million e-cig users in the UK alone. My new habit cost me less than a cup of coffee per week. Our government has been advising smokers to quit for many years. When we find a method that works for most people they want to ban it. Go figure.
After 35 years of a pack a day I had despaired of ever quitting. I tried all the well known methods, gum, patches, medications and even some not so well known like aversion therapy, counselling and hypnotherapy. 2 1/2 years ago I stumbled across ecigs and thought they may help me cut down. I stopped smoking the day my Eliquid arrived.
The despair is a distant memory and I will never go back. I enjoy vaping and have reduced my nicotine content from 18mg to 4mg, I feel so much healthier and able to enjoy life and I am astounded that they are not available everywhere.
I was a pack a day smoker for more than 25 years. I tried and failed with every approved quit method but haven’t had a smoke since I first picked up a 2nd gen e-cig three months ago. The arguments against them by the Cancer Council and others are quite frankly bizarre and show a complete disregard of health over money. I hope that such people will eventually be held accountable for their shameful actions in trying to get a life-saving product banned in order to line their own pockets.
37 years a heavy smoker. NRT didn’t work. Vaping did. 9 months without a single puff on a cigarette. What more need I say?
Why the Australian Government and various Health authorities cannot see the simple evidence in the various credible studies and the results from countless users is beyond me.
How do I get one?
Just google “e-cigarette” or go to AVF forum at http://forums.aussievapers.com/forum.php
Lots of commercial sites out there selling ecigs both here in Australia and overseas.But remember that nicotine liquids cannot be sold here in Aus. These you have to import direct from webstore sites in Asia, or America.
But best to research your stuff before going online to buy. Start with information sources like from forums on Vaping
Nu vapor forum at http://www.nu-vapor.com/forumdisplay.php?262-Nu-Beginnings-Reference-Library, or Aussie Vapers Forum at http://forums.aussievapers.com/new-vapers-forum/ both are full of helpful information for people starting out….
try http://www.itsvaping.com.au they are great and you can get every thing you need
This is why ..
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/dosed-up-on-donations-and-addicted-to-drug-company-money/story-e6freuy9-1225833194108
Slightly dated but still relevant.
No one likes to bite the hand that feeds them.
The Cancer Council of WA Australia is PRO cancer.. cant be any other explanation.. they would lose too many grants if the cancer rate dropped.
It is all about MONEY! Losses for the government, losses for big pharma, losses for big tobacco who back the government, losses for The Cancer Council, cancer is a very profitable business.This is a modern day form of genocide!.
I was a heavy smoker for 47 years and tried every way to quit possible. Nothing worked until I bought my personal vaporiser 2 1/2 months ago, it was like an instant miracle for me and now other benefits are appearing such as the almost total cessation of 30 years of constant anxiety attacks and depression. My health improves every day.
If they stop us being able to use this amazing new technology, they will have blood on their hands!
“We do not need a new reason for thousands of young Australians to be addicted to nicotine,” said Paul Grogan – such weasel words. Why doesn’t he come clean and make a clear statement. The clear thorn in his side, and people like him, that it’s a no brainer that nicotine in liquid form is vastly safer than burning tobacco, and very likely as safe as nicotine liquid in gum or patches.
I’m 2.5 years off tobacco since I started vaping. I’d been trying for 8 years using the medically condoned, often dangerous methods. Wake up Cancer Council. You ARE the problem, not the solution.
Why are you worried about young people being addicted to nicotine ? Recent studies have shown it to be beneficial for a lot of medical problems. Also it is about as addictive as that cup of coffee that you are possibly having as you read this ! Even the lethal dose of nicotine has been shown to far far greater than was originally believed. I for one have no problems with my children taking up personal vaperisers over tobacco products any time.But then again I am just one of many many people the world over who has turned their back on tobacco products and the absolutely dismal pharma NRT treatments that have such a crap success rate for something that DOES work.What would I know ?
Cancer council of Australia and the FDA are only concerned about the tax dollars lost from cigarettes otherwise you wouldnt hear a word out of them. Iam another 17 year smoker that tried everything available to quit over a 5year period with no result and often unwanted side effects. Tried an ecigarette over a year ago and havnt had or even the urge to have a cigarette since.
Best part is my health has returned to normal and I feel great
Listen up ‘cancerous council’ – if you are really that concerned about the effects of these ‘new’ things – without any significant research to back it up….how about you use your funding to fight the ‘old’ things like cigarettes, that, backed by reams of research, are known to cause cancer and kill more people than liquid nicotine each year?
please don’t say that you have and that there are alternatives (we know all about them) and that you have been successful (you have not – cigarettes are still freely available and killing people). your fighting one of the newest forms of harm reduction is just ridiculous..
thank you, no more donations from me.
25 years smoking cigarettes, 10 of those years trying to quit. Like many others I tried various methods of ceasing the habit and spent thousands of dollars in the process gum, lozenge, Allen Carr, hypnosis, cold turkey?, champix – nearly killed me from side effects! Haven’t touched a cigarette in nearly 2 years since I tried ecigs. My 2 cents our government and cancer councils want us to die
After 40 years of smoking one pack a day, my father finally went tobacco and niccotine free.
All thanks to ecigs.
Got an email from the ecig company Greensmoke that they will no longer be able to ship ecigs to Australia as of next week :o( What will my dad do now????
Idiots will always start an addiction to something or another but for others it can really be a health benifit. Common Cancer Council, embrace ecigs.
40 year smoker, no real attempts at giving it away, came across an e cigarette in an email advertisement, checked out e cigarettes on Google and ordered my first e cigarette that night, I was just happy to use it to cut my habit back due to the rising cost, I was a packet a day smoker, I have been really amazed to find, I no longer smoke regular cigarettes, I will never go back to them! Don’t take away the one thing that really works! children will benefit so much more if their parents are vapers and not smokers!
Electronic cigarettes are best alternative way to have addictive material tobacco because electronic cigarettes are battery operated electronic equipment. It contains only liquid nicotine but not all other harmful chemical that traditional cigarettes contains so health wise it is safer than traditional cigarettes. Some of electronic cigarettes do not have any harmful equipment. It contains only food flavour liquid or other flavours liquid for smoke. That’s why there are many things that create the difference between traditional cigarettes and electronic cigarettes. More on http://soulblu.com
I applaud every person who has contributed here. For my 2 cents worth, I’ll repeat, I was a smoker for 37 years, now I’m a Vaper. The government will turn law abiding taxpayers into the next type of criminal if they continue down this path. The only outcome of a ban on ecigs / personal vaporisers will be; a return to smoking tobacco (not a good result) or a black market selling (ecigs). This is a plot for one of those stupid “B” grade movies. You know the ones you sit up until 1am hoping the plot will improve, mesmerised by the poor acting and ridiculous storyline. Maybe it’s time we start a Vapers party and try for the next election!
I smoked cigarettes for nearly 30 years until I started vaping about six months ago. I knew cigarettes were killing me, yet many failed attempts to quit using patches had left me disillusioned and despairing for my health.
Six months ago i bought my first cheap e-cig starter kit and e-liquid and as far as my health goes it’s the best thing I’ve ever done!
Within a month my smokers cough had disappeared and I could climb the big sand dune at the beach without feeling like I’m asphyxiating, my house and car no longer smell like an dirty ashtray and my nicotine habit is now satisfied for a fraction of the financial cost.
Before I started vaping I was sure that I was going to die well before my time from a smoking related illness, but now that I’m vaping instead I’m confident that smoking will not be the cause of my early death, and I’m now looking forward to enjoying the extra years I’ve gained because of this wonderful new technology…
Really folks, I can honestly say that e-cigs are the greatest thing to come along since that Elizabethan explorer and scholar Sir Walter Raleigh introduced England to those now ubiquitous members of the Solanaceae family – potatoes and tobacco.
Just think, if it wasn’t for Sir Walter Raleigh giving us chips and fags we wouldn’t have such a high incidence of heart and lung disease in the English speaking world…
This illogical ideology by the Australian government and DOH is bordering criminal.
What their message is telling us is to go smoke cigarettes because nicotine for e cigs is a dangerous or deadly substance.
Wake up and embrace the facts and the research.
Nicotine is on par with Caffeine and quite frankly, if all smokers switched, we’d save around 6 million lives a year.
And this is bad how?